Right Doctrine Matters: Legitimate Science Disproves Young Earth Creation Fraud

Psalms 102:25, “Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens are the work of thy hands.”

The inspired Word of God makes a clear distinction between creation versus the actual age of the foundation of the earth itself. This passage of Scripture would make no sense if it has no impact upon the age of the earth itself. For example: Let's say that there are two brothers who are twins, born at the same time. It would make no sense for me to say that one brother is older than the other. The Bible in Psalms 102:25 calls the foundation of the earth itself “old.” In my humble opinion this verse supports an Old Earth doctrinal position.

Please listen to Pastor Curtis Hutson's (1934-1995) intriguing Wednesday evening 6-part Bible study from 1974 titled, 'DEMONOLOGY,' in which he explains why he believes in an Old Earth. At the time the movie 'The Exorcist' had just been released in 1973. Many Christians were concerned and had a bunch of questions about demons, which promoted Dr. Hutson to teach this compelling Bible series.

I woke up this morning thinking how crazy it is that anyone could actually believe dinosaurs roamed the earth just 5,000 years ago. It's insanity folks! So, I did some research. I started with Artificial Intelligence on Duck Duck Go, asking it if dinosaurs lived 5,000 years ago, and here is its response, with which I concur...

Fossil evidence shows that dinosaurs lived on Earth for about 165 million years and went extinct around 65 million years ago, long before humans appeared. Scientific dating methods, such as radiometric dating, confirm that dinosaur fossils are millions of years old, far exceeding a timeline of just 5,000 years.

Now, false prophets like Ken Ham (who preaches Lordship Salvation by the way), teach utter nonsense that dinosaurs lived with mankind 5,000 years ago. Ken Ham is a con man who has amassed a fortunate (a net worth) of a staggering $55,000,000.

How Old Are Dinosaurs Really?

It is a folly to believe in a young earth hoax folks.

I am of the firm belief that the earth itself is very old, billions of years old. In 2005, a scientist in North Carolina found "soft tissue" in a T-Rex bone. The Young Earth Creation camp went ballistic, claiming this as "proof" that the earth in only 6,000 years old. Yet, as with the rest of their ridiculous young earth claims, this new discovery proves nothing. ...

Paleontologist Mary Schweitzer made worldwide headlines in 2005 for announcing that she had discovered soft tissue preserved in 65 million year old dinosaur fossils. Those who deny the scientific evidence for the old age of the earth have attempted to leverage this discovery to cast doubt on dating methods. But that is a misrepresentation of her findings. Scott Buchanan has meticulously poured through the details of Schweitzer’s work and presented it on the blog, Letters to Creationists. He gives us here a summary of the issues. See also our interview with Schweitzer herself.

SOURCE: "Soft Tissue" in Dinosaur Bones: What Does the Evidence Really Say?

The article goes on to rightly say...

Again and again young earth creationists have pointed to some observations such as bent rock layers, polystrate fossils, the amount of salt in the ocean, apparent mingled human and dinosaur footprints, the amount of helium in the atmosphere, polonium halos, or fluctuations in the earth’s magnetic field, and claimed that since conventional (old-earth) science could not explain these observations, the earth must be young. But when genuine science is brought to bear on these issues, they are eventually readily explained within the framework of an old earth and accepted physics. It may take some years, however, to come to a satisfactory resolution. A number of these supposed evidences for a young earth are exposed here.

The discovery of soft tissue in dinosaur fossils does not disprove their age; rather, it suggests that our understanding of tissue preservation over millions of years may need to be revised. Scientists continue to use various dating methods, such as radiometric dating, to confirm that dinosaurs lived approximately 66 million years ago.

Exposing The Young Earth Hoax!

I have done my own research to see how accurate "radiometric dating" really is, and everything I've read so far from various scientific authorities say it is an extremely reliable method of determining the age of things. You cannot just reject science when it doesn't fit your religious narrative. Remember friend, everyone has a right to their own opinion, but no one has a right to their own facts! The fact is that the earth is MUCH older than 6,000 years!

“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” —Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

Really, to question the proven physics of radioactive decay is so foolish. You cannot reject the science of radioactive decay simply because you do not like what it says. If you have no reason to deny a scientific method as being valid, except that you do not like what application of the method reveals, then you have no credible reason to deny it. Young earth creationism is FAKE NEWS.

Dislike of results is not a valid reason to claim them in error. Those wilfully ignorant people who still insist that the earth is only 6,000 years old, merely wish to pick and choose what they want to believe, while ignoring legitimate science rather than believing what must be true (even if it is most unpleasant to accept in contrast to your worldview). That isn't science and it certainly is not rational. Ephesians 4:25, “Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.”

I read yesterday where infidel Ken Ham on his website is complaining that most of his critics challenge him on the age of dinosaurs, as a Smoking Gun to proves him wrong on the age of the earth. I concur. I will never accept the crazy idea that dinosaurs lived with humans 5,000 years ago, nor that Noah took baby dinosaurs aboard the ark and then God stunted their growth, which is exactly what Henry Morris III (1942-2020) errantly taught.

The Insane Dinosaur Theory Of Young Earthers

Radiometric dating is reliable according to every legitimate scientist on earth. Only wacky nuts like Ken Ham, Kent and Eric Hovind and Henry Morris III (all religious con men and charlatans) defy science with their young earth crap. These clowns are theologically dangerous!

If you persist to believe in a young earth, that is your prerogative, but you are going against the foundation of science. I encourage you to read Pastor Max D. Younce's (1935-2023) book: "The Truth About Evolution; Or, Don't Let Satan Make A Monkey Out Of You."

Also, please read: 'WITHOUT FORM AND VOID,' by Dr. Arthur C. Custance (1910-1985).

Please read chapter 12, 'THE REMODELING,' which is what I believe is the truth; God remodeled creation during the literal 6-days of Genesis chapter's one and two.

I have found at least 20 reasons why I reject a young earth idea, and firmly hold to an old earth view. I agree with science that dinosaurs were killed off about 65 million years ago (about the same number as Ken Ham's disgusting net worth). BEWARE of the young earth racket, because that's truly what it is, a LUCRATIVE DIRTY RACKET.

Let us all speak THE TRUTH to one another...